I have tasted, I have studied, I have compared, and I have read the writing on the wall. It said, "Great wines are growing right in your own state, dummy. Drink more of them, and tell people!" Why did it take me so long to realize this?
To be fair, it wasn't all my fault. I simply didn't have easy access to these NY gems. I read about them from time to time, but when I looked for them in stores all I ever found in the way of NY wines was Manischewitz. So, needless to say, I stuck to the French aisles. But I knew I was missing out on something, and I decided to dig deeper. Why were there only two or three NY bottles on store shelves? And why all the California stuff, anyway? Sure, there are some superb California wines, but there are also a lot of bad ones, primarily due to the state of mass vinification going on there. New York, by contrast, does not mass produce. Most vineyards and wineries here are small, family owned operations. This explains in part why they aren't showing up everywhere, since the production amount is relatively small. But don't let that fool you into thinking the world doesn't know about them. These wineries can boast of some prestigious international awards, I have recently learned. Fortunately, I have the opportunity to taste many excellent New York wines now, as my curiosity and my desire to drink locally led me to Vintage New York in Soho, where I am now employed. And since April is officially New York wine month, now is a fabulous opportunity to talk about what I think are the some of the best wines in the world.
I was informally educated and ordained into the world of New York wines by way of my job, where we sell New York wines exclusively (the first store to do so in the city). Initially, I suspected that half the wines would be very good, with the others being mediocre. Well I, like so many others, had a lot to learn. New York is the third largest wine producer in the country, and home to some of the world's award winning and legendary wineries such as the Lenz estate, Vinifera Wine Cellars, and America's oldest winery, Brotherhood. I have encountered very few bad wines so far, and dozens of outstanding ones. In fact, having enjoyed mostly French wines in my lifetime and having a palate that prefers Burgundy, the Finger Lakes wines are a perfect match for me. Generally, in both style and climate, New York wines are similar to French wines. So, if you prefer big oaky California Chardonnays and overtly fruity Cabernet Sauvignons, then NY wines may not be for you. However, if you tend toward the elegant, well, then you've come to the right place. I have much to say about my beloved state's terroir, too. Each region is unique, so just as a Riesling from the Keuka Lake area will tell of the shale that made up the sandy soil, a North Fork Cabernet Franc will whisper notes of herbs and spice and cool gulf stream breezes.
The Finger Lakes region, where award winning Rieslings and Pinot Noirs abound, boasts terroir comparable to Burgundy. The area's steep slopes provide excellent soil drainage, while the large bodies of water serve to moderate harsh temperatures. The often cool and damp conditions inspire grapes to produce more resveratrol, with the end result being wines more concentrated in the antioxidant. I am particularly fond of Dr. Frank's Rkatsiteli and Fleur de Pinot Noir.
On Long Island, the temperatures are warmer in summer, and there Bordeaux grapes dominate under a longer growing season. I am in love with the earthy, luscious Long Island Merlots as much as I am the dry, smoky Cabernet Francs. Long Island is known for its likeness to the Bordeaux region of France, both in the grapes planted there as well as the climate and terrain. I'll let you read more about that area from expert Lenn Thompson, whose blog, Lenndevours, is devoted to New York wines, and particularly the North Fork of Long Island. (Thank you, Lenn, for all the information and great reading you provide about NY wines)
Despite being written about in numerous publications including Wine Spectator, Food and Wine, The New York Times and others, I still think more needs to be done to promote NY wines on the east coast. We are in an era where consuming locally is more important than ever, and New York wines should be filling east coast shelves. It's the sustainable way, it's the logical and ecological way, and what's more, it's the most pleasurable way. If you're in the city or close by, don't take my word for it. Come by and taste for yourself.
3 comments:
MJ,
I adore your effort in promoting NY wines. (so is Lenn). But for the price these wines cost, their QPR value are just plain low. Frankly speaking, if anyone is on a budget and with reasonable understanding of wine, there are wines from cheaper regions that provide similar satisfactions.
Rougeandblanc,
You're right that there are cheaper quality wines from other regions, and I appreciate the fact that many people (including myself) are on a budget. It's not feasible for most of us to spend even $12 on a bottle if we're drinking wine daily. However, the only reason there aren't very many NY wines for under $10 is because the production is still small, and NY wines are still being discovered. One day that will change. For now, it is very similar to buying local and organic foods. They cost more because the farmer can't afford to compete with mass production. It simply costs more to make quality foods, especially in this country, and especially if you're a small operation. Most wineries in NY are very small operations. If they have a bad year, it puts quite a dent in their pockets. Somebody's got to pay the bills, and it's not just the wineries that have to mark up wines. The retail stores that carry NY wines are usually small places, with big city taxes to pay. That being said, I still think lower priced NY wines will be available one day. The average price now is around $18 a bottle, with some excellent $10 bottles, too. My answer to this is I buy some cheaper wines from other places for everyday/weekday consumption (I list them on the right hand side of the blog, and one is a NY wine) and I spend my $15 or $20 on NY bottles for weekends and good dinners.
I would like to add a few more points to Memoree's comment.
As a preface, I'm certainly not advocating spending beyond one's means. That's part of the larger societal problem.
But, consuming locally is really about long term thinking. The slightly greater cost of eating and drinking locally is far outweighed by the massive economic and social costs of continuing our lifestyle choices as they are now.
Consuming locally is not just about supporting local agriculture, it's not just about supporting one's local economy (which has nearly immediate benefits), it's not even just about the greater nutritional content or the fact that local produce is fresher, tastes better, and is healthier. Ultimately it's a way of life that supports sustainable and healthy living with our environment. Less shipping means less carbon dioxide going into the atmosphere. Better nutrition means lowered medical costs over your lifetime. When practiced by many people, this translates into lowered taxes because of lowered costs for medicaid, medicare, and the proposals to reduce carbon emissions are all going to cost money - we will all have to sacrifice to turn this around. There's an old adage that I think applies here:
"A stitch in time saves nine"
So, why not sacrifice a little now, enjoy better food, and save money in the long run.
Eat, Drink, and Save the Planet!
Post a Comment